<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The world is changing forever. It is getting flat, feel the pressure yet?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thebizguy.com/the-world-is-changing-forever-it-is-getting-flat-feel-the-pressure-yet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thebizguy.com/the-world-is-changing-forever-it-is-getting-flat-feel-the-pressure-yet/</link>
	<description>One Guys Take on Business, Computers, Real Estate and whatever comes to mind.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 04:28:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: concerned citizen</title>
		<link>http://thebizguy.com/the-world-is-changing-forever-it-is-getting-flat-feel-the-pressure-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>concerned citizen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 15:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://capitalactive.wordpress.com/?p=23#comment-23</guid>
		<description>Yes, the american middle calss is eroding, no doubt about it. I dont know about Friedman, but I would much rather hear about it from economists, and that the discourse on Globalization came from economists like Joesph Stiglitz (Nobel winner for economics and was Chief Economist at World Bank), Paul Krugman (Princeton), Pankaj Ghemawat (Harvard)etc. Ted Koppel interviews Friedman and Joseph Stiglitz, who ofcourse doesnt find a mention in Friedman&#039;s book!
http://select.nytimes.com/2006/04/25/opinion/25friedman-transcript.html?_r=1&amp;pagewanted=all&amp;oref=slogin

Joseph Stiglitz said while on a trip to India, that 600 million people from India (out of the one billion!) have been left out of the &quot;development&quot; fold of globalization. So, obviously, all India is not going to migrate into middle class, if anything the inequality is far, far worse now, after the advent of globalization. Similarly newspaper reports have pointed out how Chinese workers are working in apalling conditions, to chhurn out the low cost products, with poor pay, cramped rooms, no accident or health insurance benefits, no job security, no overtime, long working hours - so who is actaully benefiting from this sort of globalization? Corporates ofcourse, and the few privileged people of India nd China  who have been able to get educated in engineering and technology! Not the vast majority of population.

There is a small, but interesting book,  by Aronica and Ramdoo, &quot;The World is Flat? A Critical Analysis of Thomas Friedman&#039;s New York Times Bestseller,&quot;  which offers a counterperspective to Friedman. It is a small book compared to the 600 page tome by Friedman, and aimed at the common man and students alike. As popular as the book may be, some reviewers assert that by what it leaves out, Friedman&#039;s book is dangerous. The authors point to the fact that there isn&#039;t a single table or data footnote in Friedman&#039;s entire book. &quot;Globalization is the greatest reorganization of the world since the Industrial Revolution,&quot; says Aronica. Aronica and Ramdoo conclude by listing over twenty action items that point the way forward, and they provide a comprehensive, yet concise, framework for understanding the critical issues of globalization.

You may want to see www.mkpress.com/flat
and watch www.mkpress.com/flatoverview.html
for an interesting counterperspective on Friedman&#039;s
&quot;The World is Flat&quot;.

Also a really interesting 6 min wake-up call:  Shift Happens!  www.mkpress.com/ShiftExtreme.html

There is also a companion book listed: Extreme Competition: Innovation and the Great 21st Century Business Reformation
www.mkpress.com/extreme
http://www.mkpress.com/Extreme11minWMV.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the american middle calss is eroding, no doubt about it. I dont know about Friedman, but I would much rather hear about it from economists, and that the discourse on Globalization came from economists like Joesph Stiglitz (Nobel winner for economics and was Chief Economist at World Bank), Paul Krugman (Princeton), Pankaj Ghemawat (Harvard)etc. Ted Koppel interviews Friedman and Joseph Stiglitz, who ofcourse doesnt find a mention in Friedman&#8217;s book!<br />
<a href="http://select.nytimes.com/2006/04/25/opinion/25friedman-transcript.html?_r=1&#038;pagewanted=all&#038;oref=slogin" rel="nofollow">http://select.nytimes.com/2006/04/25/opinion/25friedman-transcript.html?_r=1&#038;pagewanted=all&#038;oref=slogin</a></p>
<p>Joseph Stiglitz said while on a trip to India, that 600 million people from India (out of the one billion!) have been left out of the &#8220;development&#8221; fold of globalization. So, obviously, all India is not going to migrate into middle class, if anything the inequality is far, far worse now, after the advent of globalization. Similarly newspaper reports have pointed out how Chinese workers are working in apalling conditions, to chhurn out the low cost products, with poor pay, cramped rooms, no accident or health insurance benefits, no job security, no overtime, long working hours &#8211; so who is actaully benefiting from this sort of globalization? Corporates ofcourse, and the few privileged people of India nd China  who have been able to get educated in engineering and technology! Not the vast majority of population.</p>
<p>There is a small, but interesting book,  by Aronica and Ramdoo, &#8220;The World is Flat? A Critical Analysis of Thomas Friedman&#8217;s New York Times Bestseller,&#8221;  which offers a counterperspective to Friedman. It is a small book compared to the 600 page tome by Friedman, and aimed at the common man and students alike. As popular as the book may be, some reviewers assert that by what it leaves out, Friedman&#8217;s book is dangerous. The authors point to the fact that there isn&#8217;t a single table or data footnote in Friedman&#8217;s entire book. &#8220;Globalization is the greatest reorganization of the world since the Industrial Revolution,&#8221; says Aronica. Aronica and Ramdoo conclude by listing over twenty action items that point the way forward, and they provide a comprehensive, yet concise, framework for understanding the critical issues of globalization.</p>
<p>You may want to see <a href="http://www.mkpress.com/flat" rel="nofollow">http://www.mkpress.com/flat</a><br />
and watch <a href="http://www.mkpress.com/flatoverview.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.mkpress.com/flatoverview.html</a><br />
for an interesting counterperspective on Friedman&#8217;s<br />
&#8220;The World is Flat&#8221;.</p>
<p>Also a really interesting 6 min wake-up call:  Shift Happens!  <a href="http://www.mkpress.com/ShiftExtreme.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.mkpress.com/ShiftExtreme.html</a></p>
<p>There is also a companion book listed: Extreme Competition: Innovation and the Great 21st Century Business Reformation<br />
<a href="http://www.mkpress.com/extreme" rel="nofollow">http://www.mkpress.com/extreme</a><br />
<a href="http://www.mkpress.com/Extreme11minWMV.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.mkpress.com/Extreme11minWMV.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

